|
The Election Commission’s model code of conduct has put several infrastructure projects in jeopardy.
In fact, some large PPP projects in the bidding stage are expected to get delayed. These are key infrastructure projects that include national highway projects, metro rail projects and the port projects. The total estimated value of these projects would be Rs one lakh crore plus.
“The model code of conduct would delay new projects but it is not likely to significantly affect progress in existing projects. However, given the current market environment, governments and project development agencies need to remain focussed on enabling investment in infrastructure. Any deterrent, including a moratorium of project award, is not welcome,” said Manish Agarwal, executive director, KPMG. “There is need for actions-immediately and quickly,” said Dr Ahmed Firoz, a Delhi based senior economist.
The delay is further adding to the worries of National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). NHAI was finding it hard to get enough bidders for its national highway projects. By the time they found some bidders, the industry was hit by the financial slowdown. Also changes in the bidding process caused further delay.
“Firstly, bidders were unhappy about a clause in the RFP document restricting the number of shortlisted bidders to a maximum of six and the matter went into litigation. Secondly, the revised RFP bidding guidelines issued in September restricted existing developers and bidders from bidding for new projects while the cap on number of shortlisted bidders was removed,” said Agarwal.
He added that out of the 35 national highways projects for which bids were invited last year, 16 received bids and six of them received only single bids. NHAI has sought the approval of the Cabinet Committee of Economic Affairs and from the EC for award of six projects to the sole bidders, which is still awaited.
“National highways projects have probably suffered the most, especially given their track record since 2004-05,” said Agarwal, adding that the model code of conduct cannot alone be faulted for this.

COMMENT
Comment on this article